VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
ACTOR
Peter WillisTony CaprariMike ThomsonDanny Keogh
DIRECTOR
Tim Spring
SYNOPSICS
Why They Sank the Titanic (2012) is a English movie. Tim Spring has directed this movie. Peter Willis,Tony Caprari,Mike Thomson,Danny Keogh are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2012. Why They Sank the Titanic (2012) is considered one of the best Documentary,History movie in India and around the world.
The Titanic sank on April 14, 1912 - Or did it? This documentary explores the conspiracy that in fact it was Titanic's sister ship the Olympic that sank on that fateful night.
Why They Sank the Titanic (2012) Trailers
Same Actors
Why They Sank the Titanic (2012) Reviews
Interesting speculation
Interesting, well-presented story of what might have actually happened - with the known facts that support this theory. Yes, it would be instructive for the viewer to see the actual documentation instead of admittedly guesswork scenes that reenact private conversations, but not many documentaries present such documents - they'd be pretty dry if they did. It does tell an engaging story about the odd events leading up to the ill-fated voyage, and present an alternate explanation of the horrible mistakes that history records - if this theory is true, the failure to launch the lifeboats until the last minute makes perfect sense. For history buffs, it's a good starting point for research. For the mildly curious, it's an entertaining look at what might have been a well-executed cover-up.
Interesting documentary, but I see many problems
This movie is exploring a conspiracy theory about the Titanic. This is an interesting idea. However there are many problems with it. One of them being that the information is either told by the word of our host (meaning little evidence if at all) and reenactments. The "MP" on the titanic is even a bit of a stretch (because if "MP" was on the titanic people would be calling it The Olympic disaster). The courthouse reenactment scenes would have been so much more believable if they referred back to the original documents. I'm not denying that it was in the courthouse of 1912 but I think the original source needed to be shown, it would have been better because they said where they got the information from.