logo
VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
Download
Snuff-Movie (2005)

Snuff-Movie (2005)

GENRESHorror
LANGEnglish
ACTOR
Jeroen KrabbéLisa EnosTeri Harrison-KeatonAlastair Mackenzie
DIRECTOR
Bernard Rose

SYNOPSICS

Snuff-Movie (2005) is a English movie. Bernard Rose has directed this movie. Jeroen Krabbé,Lisa Enos,Teri Harrison-Keaton,Alastair Mackenzie are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2005. Snuff-Movie (2005) is considered one of the best Horror movie in India and around the world.

Boris Arkadin is a horror film maker. His pregnant wife was brutally murdered by a Manson-like gang of hippy psychopaths during the 1960s. He becomes a virtual recluse - until years later he directs his own snuff inspired movies. He invites actors to take part in an audition at his country manor house - blurring the lines of what is real and what is fiction.

More

Snuff-Movie (2005) Reviews

  • Clever script but never scary

    phillamg2005-08-28

    This film kept every guessing until the very final seconds of the film to try to understand it. The plot is very twisted and you often feel split as to what is actually happening and that's were the problem lies. Because you are detached trying to think about the (not especially graphic) scenes you are seeing you never feel engrossed in the movie or empathise with any of the characters. You always expect that you'll be fooled any second now. For the final 10 minutes I think I figured out what the medium sized plot was all about (either that or there was a prop goof) but while I was 99% sure, I had no idea how to explain it or how it fitted in with the entire film. That may sound complicated and convoluted but believe me, the script really is. Well shot and well acted, but just not scary, even on a simple gore level (watch Haute Tension for that).

    More
  • strange but fascinating!!

    johannes2000-12006-10-15

    This is a very strange movie and I find it hard to decide whether it's just over-pretentious or a truly intelligent, maybe even brilliant attempt to unravel the mysteries of the dark corners in the human mind. When the movie began, I thought: man, I got myself the wrong movie, this is some sixties' Hammer horror flick. Ten minutes later I thought: wait a minute, this turns out to be some seventies over the top reconstruction of the Sharon Tate murders. And again ten minutes later it suddenly turned into a movie taking place in the present. These changes were all unexpected and they sort of set the tone for the rest of the movie: nothing is what it appears to be, every time you think: okay, NOW I get it, you keep getting surprised and it turns out a totally different way, even till the very last minutes of the movie. I have to admit that this kept me fascinated and watching, although at the same time I had the uncanny feeling that I was made a fool of, and someone was trying to find out how long you can serve bad food and still make someone eat it. Part of the problem is the almost overall mediocre acting. The only one that stands out is Jeroen Krabbé, he certainly delivers an excellent and very chilling performance as the sinister, perverted, probably psychopathic but also very charming director. Although he's not really attractive, he does have a huge screen-presence and he sort of carries the whole project on his shoulders. Lisa Enos is a feast for the eyes (with and without clothes), but it unnerved me a bit that she let herself be so extremely exploited by appearing for (over)long takes in full frontal nude (like her audition-scene in the beginning and the grand scene in the garden almost at the end). But maybe that unnerving feeling was all part of the plan, it sticked by me during the whole movie. Some goings-on are totally over the top, like the irritating hysteria of the group of weird killer-girls. Other over the top moments (like the deranged and invalid son stumbling into Krabbé's bedroom to kill him), somehow seem to serve their own purpose in creating bewilderment and disbelief. There's lots of gore, albeit not always as graphically displayed as you may emotionally experience it, there's also a lot of suggestion, which of course adds up to the main theme of "real or not-real". This movie is obviously about exploitation, about people abusing other people (and let themselves be abused) out of purely opportunistic motives. But ultimately it's about the very game of fooling. We, the viewers, are tricked again and again, and although we know that in a horror movie it's all fake, (even in a movie that's called "Snuff movie"), here we are forced to make time and again a total mind-switch and re-adjust our convictions. It results in a feeling that you never fully get into control of what is presented to you. Different from that other excellent movie about the theme of snuff-movies, "Tesis", by Alejandro Amenabar, here we are not helped by any coherent plot, it's as if the director wants us to step backwards and just look at things unfold from a distance. As a consequence you never get involved with the persons at all, but it does enhance the awkward feeling of estrangement. The end of the movie – the surprising bow of Krabbé (to us?) – reminded me of the ending of Verdi's Falstaff: stepping out of the role back into the real life and saying (or suggesting) to the public: "really, the whole world is nothing but a sham!". Which feeling gets enhanced when watching the closing credits of the cast roll by: there you see that almost every actor had two or more different roles, and I hadn't even noticed half of them! So it definitely is a movie to watch twice.

    More
  • I enjoyed it.

    rogerwalkertwo-12005-09-06

    This isn't a horror film as much as it is a film about horror. In a Don Quixote-ian attempt to create features outside of the "Holywood" norm, Bernard Rose has created another horror film..but this time, it seems, with no restrictions whatsoever. This has all the feel of the classical "content" driven horror films of the seventies. Don't Look Now - comes to mind as well as other low budget thrillers that have achieved cult status. The director takes us from Hammer Horror to online snuff footage in just a couple reels. Rose has proved himself very capable of handling the genre of horror films with his extensive catalogue, including Candyman and Paperhouse. Rose is attempting to showing us the unreality of the horror genre and all media in general. The ultimate lies that are inherent in film making...from framing a camera shot to editing to sound design they can all be manipulated to create any response desired. Our response is utter shock at the depravity of the action in this film. At times the film becomes deprecating and so self referential that I had to laugh. Even the characters laugh at themselves at some of the references. For instance one "actor" is told he, "is the care taker." At that point he realizes the reference himself. There is a cavalcade of characters from recent history that the film refers to; from Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski (Boris Arkadin Character) to Private Lyndie England, It seems Rose has addressed more in this movie and he's creating more questions than he's answering. Which is fine because, quite frankly, I already forgot what happened in the last "Chucky" movie. I am glad to see a director let loose and have total control of the production. I would like to see more of it. This isn't mindless or passive theatre and it is definitely worth a more than one viewing. It is most certainly going to be either loved or hated.

    More
  • Awful or Genius? or Awfully genius? ...or just awful?

    Dangermartin2008-09-01

    "From the Director of Candyman" was what convinced me to buy this film, and also the fact that it stars Jeroen "Georgi Koskov" Krabbé. I'm not sure what I expected from this film and I'm still unsure as to what it was that I actually saw. Throughout the entire film I was confused as to whether I was watching a work of pure genius or the worst pile of excrement that I have ever seen. The film had promise but was let down by poor acting and would have benefited from a larger budget. The plot twists and turns, and stumbles and falls... However there was something about this film that I liked, I just can't put my finger on what it was. Maybe i'm just not of high enough intelligence to fully understand it, or maybe it actually was just a terrible movie... I don't know. But I like not knowing. I wouldn't recommend this film to fans of 'Candyman' but i'd say its worth a watch if your into low-budget horror movies. 5/10 - purely because I watched it 3 days ago and i'm still thinking about it. So it can't be that bad, right???

    More
  • Awesome... Thought provoking and shocking

    C_Karber2005-09-02

    I just saw it at the Edinburgh Film Festival and I think this film is absolutely brilliant! First, Thank god that a smart horror film has arrived in a genre long stagnated with mediocrity, slasher nonsense or "around the corner, haunted house" horror. If you are the someone who needs high budget Hollywood filler, then this might not be for you. This is what good film making should be...thought provoking and entertaining. It even has a bit of the old ultra violence thrown in for good measure! Leave it to Bernard Rose (a real auteur - wrote and directed last several films) to create a thoughtful and complex horror film reminiscent of Ken Russell or Dario Angento. His commentary on the horror genre, violence, sex and voyeurism (in general) is outstanding and could only come from a master director of horror (Candyman - Paperhouse) In Snuff-Movie, Rose has assembled movies on top of movies which all make up this movie. Sounds strange? Watch the film and you'll get it! Each movie is unique in its reference to a particular element of horror and constantly questions what horror truly is. Rose refers to these different elements and expands to even incorporate our fascination with voyeurism with TV's (Big Brother - Reality TV) and the internet (web cam sex etc). The film's narrative progresses forward through the use of these different "movies" and keeps us guessing as to what is next and what is real. It's constant changes are referential to the TV channel switching age we live which is fueled by violence and the viewers ever increasing need for it. Ironically, Rose is smart enough to understand horror and address it from alternate view points. He makes some wonderful references (to so many other horror films) throughout that I was thoroughly amused! Conversely, There is so much outstanding social commentary you have to appreciate it. For instance the murderous tortures all looking like Private England dressed in Camouflage but with fangs. Then there is a comment on an internet porn search that reveals one characters girlfriend. Talk about playing on your fears in the modern age! Like in most reality shows...I found the acting (across the board) stifled and contrived. I found the sets stifled and contrived. I thought the characters looked like they were wearing wigs....then it dawned on me that I was being taking for a "ride" by Rose and when the final scene takes place, it all made perfect sense! Brilliant. What a commentary! Remember, this is a movie. Movies aren't real. At what level are you going to suspend your disbelief? Must see!!

    More

Hot Search