Mirror Mirror 3: The Voyeur (1995) Reviews

• Pretty bad

  dexterslade2001-01-03

  Monique Parent is an attractive woman but even attractive women can't hide a bad film with zero thrills and unerotic sex scenes. Parent has done much more steamier work than this pathetic excuse for a horror film. View at your own risk.

• This is dire.

  justinwilliams3712006-03-30

  There is nothing redeeming about this film. First one was OK. The second one was great purely for the presence of Roddy McDowell. The leading lady has a good figure but that is only interesting for the first minute or two. It is poor, poor, poor. I have seen better school plays. Although made in the mid nineties, the film quality is reminiscent of the early eighties B movies. The dialogue is as cheesy as it comes and the acting, oh dear. With regards to this film someone has definitely lost the plot. There isn't one. Really, stay clear if you can, but if you are willing to sit through it just to complete the series, then disengage your brain.

• Those idiots trashed the series!

  whammy6662005-02-13

  Wow, I bought the Mirror, Mirror boxed set. Part 1 is a classic. Part 2 is good. And I had not seen 3. I heard it was bad but wowwwwwwwww. It is bad. This is one of the worst films I have seen in my life. It looks like a 2 year old made it. No, a 2 year old could of done better. I am amazed by this crap. The acting sucks. The directing sucks. The special effects suck. The quality of the film sucks. I cannot say one good thing about this film except Jimmy Lifton's score is still around and that is good music. I cannot think of another positive thing about this film. UGh all it is is these 2 people having sex for an hour and a half then some people die. The mirror does look the same as in the other films but that does not matter. Nothing on Earth can save this miserable piece of crap. 1/10

• Sex scenes and Billy Drago ..........

  merklekranz2010-06-16

  "Mirror Mirror 3 " confirms that Billy Drago should stick with the typecast psycho villains he usually plays. His whispering acting technique is totally lost in this excruciatingly boring film. Watching the paint dry on artist Drago's canvases would prove more interesting than this mess. It's something about a mirror, an old house, and a drug dealer's wife brought back from the dead. When the plot synopsis on the back of the DVD box takes up only six lines, you know things are going to be rough. Other than Billy Drago, there is nothing here of interest, except a few unexciting sex scenes with a couple of really bad actresses. Avoid at all costs. - MERK

• Worst Blood Ever

  betterthanyouall2005-06-18

  Okay, I have just finished watching this movie, and it is pure, unadulterated crap. But that is beside the point. It would be great if they had more of the soft core porn feel if THERE WERE MORE THAN TWO FEMALES IN THE MOVIE. Seriously. The blonde woman rarely does get in the spirit of the pornographic nature of this film. She gets naked twice. The other girl does it quite a bit. In flashbacks. OF THE SAME DAMN SCENE. This one doesn't suffer from SWIRLY CAM OF DOOM syndrome like Raven Dance did. But still. My main problem, however, is the blood is so ridiculously watered down. The classic "blood drips down the mirror" thing that happened in the first two was ridiculous. The water...err blood...didn't even drip down realistically, nor in impressive amounts like the first two (it also hurt that no female was getting near orgasmic seeing it, just some creepy middle aged man who keeps having sex with the same girl over and over and over-acting), seriously, I'd rather watch THE KNIGHT FROM THE STAINED GLASS WINDOW IN RAVEN DANCE star in a buddy cop comedy with Air Bud than watch this film again. All I can say is why David Naughtan? Why?